 |
MOBILE
UTOPIA
Charles Esche
Asked to write something about Utopia, I think of two things,
or two quotes to be precise. One by Robert Musil occurs towards
the end of The Man without
Qualities, when the eponymous hero Ulrich says: "And
now I ask you-is there anyone who would not be at a loss if
whatever he had been passionately demanding all his life long
were suddenly to happen? If for instance the Kingdom
of God were suddenly to burst on the Catholics or the Utopian
State on the Socialists? But perhaps that doesn't prove anything...What
I mean is that reality in itself has a nonsensical yearning
for unreality".
The second is in the title of a short essay by Pierre Bourdieu
written in 1998: Neo-Liberalism:
The Utopia of Unlimited Exploitation. He goes on to
ask: "What if (neo-liberalism) were, in reality, only
the implementation of a utopia converted into a political
programme. A utopia that, with the aid of the economic theory
to which it subscribes, manages to see itself as the scientific
description of reality"
Perhaps it is an obvious question but why are literary Utopias
always islands? They are always the exceptions that prove
the rule, surrounded by an isolating sea that determines their
survival. It is true that it may represent that poetic yearning
for unreality that Musil talks of, but that is just what worries
me about them when it comes to using Utopia as a metaphor
for art. Because I want art to be part of the messed up, compromised
society we all live in. I detest the demand for absolute autonomy
and perfect form, with its intimations of closure and death.
The island Utopia's lack of accountability to the mainland's
here and now is dangerous. It may serve as a model but it
is be an excuse for inaction, irresponsibility and affirmation
of the status quo.
Yet, when Utopia misunderstands itself as something real
it is, if anything, even worse. As Bourdieu realises and history
teaches, a real existing Utopia is invariably horrific for
human beings. Surely, having seen the prescribed Utopias of
community, faith, socialism or neo-liberalism being misused
so terribly, we should be wary of the term when it comes to
contemporary art.
So, you will have to take what I say in the little travelogue
below with a pinch of salt. It is intended more like a recipe
in a cookbook than a musing on utopia anyway. I like cookbooks
more because they have practical aspirations. They talk about
what could be made from what is and the best food writers
always make us imagine their food in our heads as much as
wanting to make it. Nevertheless, this journey was a kind
of temporary, mobile utopia that lasted only one day, so it
seems an appropriate enough response.
Drive out of Basel on an August morning. Head north. Take
good company with you - people you love and, ideally, someone
knowledgeable about your destination. As you leave Switzerland,
look up at the vines on the hills, the Blauburgunder grapes
ripening as you pass. You remember that you had drunk the
same wine last night and, as the others drive and chat, let
that slight hangover allow your to mind slip out of gear and
reach out into the passing landscape. Follow the course of
the Rhine until it spills out over the Dutch landscape, so
different from the low hills of the eastern Vosges. Recall,
at the same time, that the importance of the river meant that
for most of history, The Netherlands was more influential
than the interior of Switzerland to a native of Basel or Colmar.
And even further back, you seem to think you once heard that
the Rhine had originally turned south at this point, heading
not for the North Sea but for the Mediterranean, until an
earthquake shifted its course. What difference would it have
made if the change had not happened and if a southern culture
had had easy access to the heart of the mountains? A different
climate, a different division of Europe, another route for
trade and emigration - the consequences are too huge to comprehend
and, here you are, driving on, worrying where the next wage
cheque will come from.
The route follows the Rhine for only a short distance before
crossing over into France at Mulhouse and steering north westward
towards Colmar. This is your first destination, for lunch
and Grünewald. The town of Colmar is small and classically
Alsatian, a shambling mix of Germanic half-timbered Hansel
und Gretel architecture and north Latin atmosphere. Despite
its history of conflict, it still offers a model for a future
western European union. Near the centre a short run of shops
by the small river leads to two simple cafes. Take the one
on the left as you approach the main square. Eat freshwater
fish and flammekueche, onion soup if it is unseasonably cold,
then head for the Musie d'Unterlinden, a marriage of languages
and forms of expression that somehow sets the tone for what
is to come.
Your companions should, at this point, have given you some
background information. As you walk across the square towards
the museum, you are armed with the following basic details.
Grünewald's altarpiece, the Retable
d'Issenheim, was commissioned for the hospital chapel
of the monastery at Isenheim about twenty miles south of Colmar
around 1510. The monks specialised in the treatment of skin
diseases including leprosy and syphilis and the altarpiece
would have been seen and prayed to by all their patients.
The early sixteenth century is a moment of earth-shattering
change as Europeans begin their journeys of conquest around
the world and the anonymity of mediaeval life gives way to
the individualism of the Renaissance. These facts, specific
and general, resonate with you as you negotiate the gallery
corridors towards the work you have come to see.
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Crucifixion
(Issenheim alter piece, c. 1510) Matthias
Grünewald |
Now I am in difficulty. The first impression of the crucifixion
image surpasses all description. Christ is not simply dying
but demonstrably suffering. His skin, and remember who originally
saw this, falls in loose folds around his skeleton, pierced
by the whips used in his torture and by the broken thorns
falling from his crown. It is a picture of a frightened, desperate
human being. It makes you conscious not of the Christian God
but of our life here on earth. It seems almost unchristian,
or at least heretical, as though Christ's divinity is really
in doubt. Above all, it is indescribably beautiful. Around
and between this central image, the other tableaux are almost
invisible. The alter piece has three distinct positions and,
in the museum, the piece is exploded so that you can see them
all simultaneously. Usually only the crucifixion was visible
but on some Sundays and saints days, inner pictures would
be revealed. In one, a much less convincing image of the resurrection,
with a smiling, almost childish image of Christ surrounded
by light, serves to reinforce the strength and humanity of
the suffering on the cross - its unconvincing picture of Christ
in majesty simply not enough of a counterweight for what went
before. The final position reveals stone sculptures by Nicholas
of Hagenau which are actually the original structure of the
altarpiece to which Grünewald added his various screens.
If you think for a moment about this work in contemporary
terms, it becomes overwhelming. Here is an artist who turns
to the one subject his viewers and commissioners are most
likely to want to forget. The patients' suffering is emphasised
but also shared with the figure of Christ without denying
in any way their immense burden of pain. Not only this, but
he manages to reach out beyond the hospital to touch on the
human condition itself, without ever patronising his clients
or treating them as irrelevant. He uses an existing frame,
thus appropriating augmenting an existing artistic production,
to perform this incredible feat. Finally, he provides a dubious
salvation, comforting for the ill but, surely, laden with
his own fears and uncertain faith.
Walk slowly away from this because it takes time to take
it in. Yet remember the time and start out soon for Ronchamp
and Le Corbusier's small pilgrimage chapel, because the two
must be seen in the same day and in daylight. The drive to
Ronchamp, through countryside that has seen some of the worst
armed conflict in the twentieth century is sobering. After
Grünewald, the suffering of war seems greater, the motive
even less explicable. Park in the village at its western end
and walk up to the Chapelle Notre-Dame du Haut. On the way,
a old wooden mine head emerges out of the forest. Long disused,
its presence on this religious trail, provokes another moment
of remembering. The Renaissance was about technological advance
just as much as today's world. Grünewald himself was something
of a sixteenth century traditionalist, for Italian early modern
society was in full swing, based partly on global trade and
the beginnings of empire. That someone 'behind the times'
could produce the Retable
d'Issenheim is salutary for those of us driven by the
quest for artistic innovation. As these thoughts occur, and
standing before this primitive disused mineshaft, you may
find it hard to avoid a certain nostalgia for the old certainties
of nineteenth century socialism. Do not succumb however, but
remain on guard against determinism of all kinds. Le Corbusier,
of all people, will tell us that our future is not entirely
out of our hands.
Climb further until, above the trees, the chapel rises. Pay
your entry, but pause and look carefully at the location before
ascending to the building. Circumnavigate it at least twice
before entering through the north door. These instructions
should again be clearly given by your companions because a
knowledge of the whole of the exterior is both necessary and
totally confusing once you walk inside. You should first remark
on the cave-inspired construction of the south wall from the
outside, pierced by deep-set irregular rectangles of glass.
On the east side, climb the stepped pyramid and look around
at the environment. Step down and stand at the edge of the
shadow which should by now be coming from the west. Here is
the prime position for the external congregation, the little
pulpit off to the left underneath the Viking canopy of heavy
grey concrete. Now walk further round and go inside.
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Chapel
ronchamp
(interior view) Charles
Le Corbusier |
|
This is the moment to remember Grünewald again. As you enter
the north door, what do you see? Not the altar, not the priest
readying his homily, not the cross, but the pews and the people,
with the pierced south wall shining the sun's light onto each
one of them. Grünewald's point about humanity in the world
is forced home again, only this time in the mass of the congregation
rather than as an individual. Then, turning your head left,
you find not a great altarpiece but a small, slightly feeble
cross dominated from above by that same sloping concrete roof
that hung over the pulpit outside. Only now, it is not the
massive form alone but lifted and lightened so that its right
hand corner breaks free the open gap between wall and roof.
Here, our only clear view is out to an isolated fragment of
perfect blue sky.This magical sliver draws the world into
the building, in a way that I can only describe as pre-Christian,
reminding us of our powers of protection against the ineffable
forces of nature. Without the building, the views both outwards
and inwards continue. Standing alone in the soaring bell tower
with its long narrow slit of light or moving round to the
north wall where a huge guttering pipe shoots water off the
roof in a torrent, you are in a constant state of optical
wonder. But the kinship between these two artists, separated
by over 400 years, resonates most. Both doubtful Christians
(I imagine), both manipulators of a particular commission,
both using the site to say something specific to it as well
as to the world in general, both makers of beauty, both political
and passionate, both examples to us all.
As the sun goes down, return to Basel, eat a little and go
to bed without further distractions.
Charles Esche
Charles Esche is director
of Rooseum
Center for Contemporary Art, Malmö, Sweden and editor
of Afterall
Journal of Art.
|
 |